Floatingaxehead wrote:
I must also remind you of what Hell is for. Now, imagine someone who beat you at everything. The best of the best. In fact, in order to be sustained, you have to rely on him. Now, as ugly as that may appear, that is God. You look around at the world, and realize that 100% of people are going to die [sometime], and they could either go to someone they rejected or to someone they accepted. People who "sit on the fence" aren't actually sitting on the fence, as they still put up a wall to completely enjoy "the grace that could be theirs." Rather than send them to him, he sends them to someone they accepted, their desires, the world. (Basically, Hell.) He won't force people who find him to be an abomination to be with him for eternity, for that would be torture for them as well. Rather, he shuts them out, where they ironically would rather be. [Don't like God? Why then would you be with him?] If anything, as shown in Revelations, it doesn't really matter, as all people eventually turn back to God in the realization that he is the great  I AM, and without him, we are litterally nothing.Â
But seriously, why would a supposedly all loving God put ANYBODY in a torturous situation? I wouldn't turn to God for ANY reason. I don't need God to be something. Why would I wanna spend eternity with somebody like him? Do you even know what it means to sit on a fence? Being secular isn't about doing what you want. Secular people don't accept Satan. Why would I need to rely on somebody to be sustained? There's no "rejection" anywhere.